AMCAP Journal of Media and Communication Studies - Lahore

Journal of Media and Communication Studies

Association of Media and Communication Academic Professionals (AMCAP)
ISSN (online): 2789-9756

Freedom of Expression vs. Hate Speech – An Ethical Dilemma

  • Sumera Batool/
  • February 10, 2021
Keywords
Freedom of expression, Hate speech, Social Media, Ethical Dilemma
Abstract

The controversies on intolerance for others and differences of opinions have raised a question for deep understanding of the clash on the narrative of claiming freedom of expression and exercising hate speech against others . This dilemma needs to be addressed by legal and ethical considerations. The media, specifically social media, is such a platform that brings the consumers on a common board by providing the avenues of expression and raising the voices and issues of marginalized communities or groups. The power of social media is realized by providing immediate and high level of interactivity to the users, whereas the practices and usage of social media is questionable in this regard. The articulation of hatred against the targeted communities with the cover of freedom of expression is considerably important to discuss. The hate speech endangers the rights of the targeted ones. This paper attempts to draw the working narratives of freedom of expression and hate speech, to document the growth of legal framework for freedom of expression and hate speech, to focus on the ethical framework for the social media users. This paper argues for the need of collective and shared responsibility from the three stakeholders; state, media and individuals.

References

Bell, J. (2009). Restraining the heartless: Racist speech and minority rights. Indiana. Journal,84(3),963-979.

Retrieved from : https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol84/iss3/9

Benesch, S. (2014). Defining and diminishing hate speech. Freedom from hate: State of the world’s minorities and indigenous peoples 2014, 18-25.

George, C. (2015). Managing the dangers of online hate speech in South Asia. Media Asia42(3-4), 144-156.

Haider, I. (2015). NA committee approves ‘Controversial’ cyber crime bill’ , Dawn, Online available  http://www.dawn.com/news/1176299/na-committee-approves-controversial-cyber-crime-bill

Hamelink, C. J. (2000). Ethics for media users. Media Ethics: Opening Social Dialogue, Leuven: Peeters, 393-401.

Johnson-Cartee, K. S. (2004). News narratives and news framing: Constructing political reality. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Leets, L. (2002). Experiencing hate speech: Perceptions and responses to anti-Semitism and antigay speech. Journal of social issues58(2), 341-361.

Leets, L., & Giles, H. (1999). Harmful speech in intergroup encounters: An organizational framework for communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association22(1), 91-137.

Leets, L., Giles, H., & Noels, K. (1999). Attributing harm to racist speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development20(3), 209-215.

Lipschultz, J. H. (2015). Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. New York: Routledge

Whillock, R. K. (1995). The use of hate as a stratagem for achieving political and social goals. Hate speech, 28-54.

 

Statistics

Author(s):

Assistant Professor, Department of Mass Communication, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan

Pakistan

  • sumerabatoolnaqvi@yahoo.com

Details:

Type: Article
Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Language: English
Id: 60218f03ea253
Pages 66 - 72
Published February 10, 2021

Statistics

  • 516
  • 277
  • 198
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.