The proliferation of technology has made it easy for people to shop online using multiple platforms. Despite vulnerabilities related to privacy during online shopping, people still shop online which raises concern about inconsistency in their attitude towards privacy also known as the “Privacy paradox”. Drawing upon the theoretical perspectives of Privacy Calculus theory, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Privacy Protection Motivation, this study aims to analyse the privacy concerns among Generation Z in Pakistan and explore the privacy paradox they depict. The purposive sampling is used to collect data for this cross-sectional study from 720 university students in the Generation Z age group studying in six universities in Punjab. The main inclusion criteria is choosing students who often shop online and are in the age bracket of 18-28. Findings showed that the more privacy concerns a person has the more careful he would be while doing online shopping. The relationship between privacy literacy and online shopping is a negative correlation which means that more the privacy literate a person is, the fewer online purchases they will make. This research stresses that people need to be more vigilant while sharing their information on online ecosystems. The findings of this study expand the theoretical understanding of the privacy paradox establishing two very opposite and non-aligned attitudes of shoppers. It also offers an opportunity for sales managers in the fashion industry to look at their digital models to reconsider privacy standards and also helps them investigate the dichotomy of behaviour. 

Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 347(6221), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465

Ainsworth, K. (2024, March 8). Shein and Temu are unstoppable forces in online retail. Are Australian businesses under threat? Australian Broadcasting Cooperation. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-08/rise-of-shein-temu-effect-on-australian-retail-ecommerce-future/103546188

Al-Ameen, M. N., Chauhan, A., Ahsan, M. M., & Kocabas, H. (2021). A look into user’s privacy perceptions and data practices of IoT devices. Information & Computer Security, 29(4), 573-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-08-2020-0134

Alić, M., & Sopić, L. (2023, May). Privacy Paradox and Generation Z. In 2023 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO) (pp. 1532-1537). IEEE.

Barth, S., & De Jong, M. D. (2017). The privacy paradox–Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior–A systematic literature review. Telematics and informatics, 34(7), 1038-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013

Brettel, M., Reich, J. C., Gavilanes, J. M., & Flatten, T. C. (2015). What drives advertising success on Facebook? An advertising-effectiveness model: Measuring the effects on sales of “likes” and other social-network stimuli. Journal of Advertising Research, 55(2), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.300286

Brown, B. (2001). Studying the internet experience. HP laboratories technical report HPL, 49. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=563a300a287ff45eb897d100f26d59d4d87c62c2

Colnago, J., Cranor, L. F., & Acquisti, A. (2023, July). Is there a reverse privacy paradox? an exploratory analysis of gaps between privacy perspectives and privacy-seeking behaviors. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium (pp. 455-476).

Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International journal of human-computer studies, 45(1), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040

Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European journal of social psychology, 45(3), 285-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2049

Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew research center, 17(1), 1-7.

Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information systems research, 17(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080

Gerber, N., Gerber, P., & Volkamer, M. (2018). Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior. Computers & security, 77, 226-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002

GlobalWebIndex. (2019). Generation Z: The Global Market Research Report. Retrieved from https://www.gwi.com/reports/generation-z-2019

Greenwood, R. M., & Manning, R. M. (2017). Mastery matters: Consumer choice, psychiatric symptoms and problematic substance use among adults with histories of homelessness. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(3), 1050-1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12405

Gurung, A., & Raja, M. K. (2016). Online privacy and security concerns of consumers. Information & Computer Security, 24(4), 348-371. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-05-2015-0020

Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., & Ranzini, G. (2016). Privacy cynicism: A new approach to the privacy paradox. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10(4). : http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2016-4-7

Imtiaz, S., Ali, S. H., & Kim, D. J. (2020). E-commerce growth in Pakistan: Privacy, security, and trust as potential issues. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 26(2), 10-18. https://rb.gy/w46wn1

Javed, Y., Salehin, K. M., & Shehab, M. (2020). A study of South Asian websites on privacy compliance. Ieee Access, 8, 156067-156083. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3019334

Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American behavioral scientist, 65(2), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406

Koch, K., Krenn, S., Pellegrino, D., & Ramacher, S. (2020). Privacy-preserving analytics for data markets using MPC. In IFIP International Summer School on Privacy and Identity Management (pp. 226-246). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & security, 64, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002

Lwin, M., Wirtz, J., & Williams, J. D. (2007). Consumer online privacy concerns and responses: A power–responsibility equilibrium perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0003-3

Madden, M., Gilman, M., Levy, K., & Marwick, A. (2017). Privacy, poverty, and big data: A matrix of vulnerabilities for poor Americans. Wash. UL Rev., 95, 53.

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information systems research, 15(4), 336-355. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032

Marangunic, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal access in the information society, 14, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Margarida Barreto, A. (2013). Do users look at banner ads on Facebook?. Journal of research in interactive marketing, 7(2), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-Mar-2012-0013

McKee, K. M., Dahl, A. J., & Peltier, J. W. (2024). Gen Z’s personalization paradoxes: A privacy calculus examination of digital personalization and brand behaviors. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2199

Mirza, F., Ashraf, M. Z., & Ashraf, S. (2021). Privacy Paradox in Facebook: An Online Social Networking Site. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i4/8831

Mustafa, M., Asad, A. M., Hassan, S., Haider, U., Durrani, Z., & Krombholz, K. (2023, November). Pakistani teens and privacy-how gender disparities, religion and family values impact the privacy design space. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 195-209).

Nazir, S., Tayyab, A., Sajid, A., ur Rashid, H., & Javed, I. (2012). How online shopping is affecting consumers buying behavior in Pakistan?. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 9(3), 486. https://rb.gy/zrl7w1

Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of consumer affairs, 41(1), 100-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x

Phelps, J., Nowak, G., & Ferrell, E. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of public policy & marketing, 19(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941

Rifon, N. J., LaRose, R., & Lewis, M. L. (2007). Resolving the privacy paradox: toward a social-cognitive theory of consumer privacy protection. Retrieved January, 25, 2012.

Safdar, G. (2021). Cultural aspiration across the borders: measuring the cultural effects of online media on Pakistani youth. Online Media and Society, 2, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.71016/oms/v1bp0k28

Salisbury, W. D., Pearson, R. A., Pearson, A. W., & Miller, D. W. (2001). Perceived security and World Wide Web purchase intention. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(4), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570110390071

Samuel, A., & Scher, A. (1999). Cookies Are Not So Sweet—Online Database Marketing. Dollars & Sense,(January/February), 7.

Sattar, S., & Ameer, M. H. (2014). Online Shopping adaptation by individuals in Pakistan. International Institute for Science, Technology and Education, 4(3), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejss.2021.09.01.004

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2015). Who is Generation Z?. In (Eds). Generation Z goes to college. Danvers: John Wiley & Sons.

Shabbir, S. (9 July 2024). Rights activists raise privacy concerns after Pakistan authorizes top spy agency to tap calls, messages. Arab News. https://www.arabnews.pk/node/2546556/pakistan

Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS quarterly, 167-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/249477

Statista. (2024, August 13). Number of internet and social media users worldwide as of July 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/

Stoilova, M., Nandagiri, R., & Livingstone, S. (2021). Children’s understanding of personal data and privacy online–a systematic evidence mapping. Information, Communication & Society, 24(4), 557-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657164

Wang, P., & Petrison, L. A. (1993). Direct marketing activities and personal privacy: A consumer survey. Journal of Direct Marketing, 7(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.4000070104

Weible, R. J. (1993). Privacy and data: An empirical study of the influence of types of data and situational context upon privacy perceptions. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Weinberger, M., Bouhnik, D., & Geffet, M. Z. (2017, April 18). Factors Affecting Students’ Privacy  Paradox and Privacy Protection Behavior. Open Information Science, 3-20. doi:DOI  10.1515/opis-2017-0002

Wu, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., & Jin, H. (2018). Towards privacy-preserving visual recognition via adversarial training: A pilot study. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) (pp. 606-624). http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_ECCV_2018/papers/Zhenyu_Wu_Towards_Privacy-Preserving_Visual_ECCV_2018_paper.pdf

Yousaf, U., Altaf, M., Sarwar, N., & Hassan SHAH, S. A. (2012). Hesitancy towards Online Shopping, A Study of Pakistani Consumers. Management & Marketing Journal, 10(2). http://mnmk.ro/documents/2012-secondpart/7-23-2-12-FFF.pdf

Yuniar, A. D., & Fibrianto, A. S. (2019, June). Big Data Dilemma: Technology Advance Versus Privacy Violation. In 1st International Conference on Social Knowledge Sciences and Education (ICSKSE 2018) (pp. 203-206). Atlantis Press.