This study examines the complexities of the social problems of Pakistan explained by Pakistani independent filmmakers in their films. Four independent films that were produced in the past two decades by two Pakistani filmmakers, Shoaib Mansoor and Sabiha Sumar, were analyzed for their discourses. The findings show that the directors articulated the dynamics of women’s oppression and the sociopolitical climate of Pakistan by using their own distinctive approaches. The films centered mainly on a critique of Islamic fundamentalism and patriarchal culture as the main driving forces of social problems that determine women’s status in Pakistan. In the process of articulating the complexity of social problems, it was evident that Mansoor represented the problem in a cultural context by placing certain ethnic identities as the causal agents while Sumar framed the problem to be driven mainly by certain ideological forces. Furthermore, Mansoor's movies portrayed a more optimistic viewpoint, suggesting that women's rights could be advanced through current legal measures and economic changes within the country. Sumar’s films, on the other hand, were more realistic, representing the prevailing status of women in Pakistani society. Her films suggest that women’s empowerment in the existing social system and state institutions is improbable.

Afkhami, M. (2001). Gender apartheid, cultural relativism, and women’s human rights in Muslim societies. In M. Agosin (Ed.), Women, gender, and human rights: A global perspective (pp. 234-245). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Ahmad, A. N., & Anjum, S. (2014). Independent filmmaking in Pakistan: An interview with Sabiha Sumar. BioScope: South Asian Screen Studies, 5, 153-162. doi:10.1177/0974927614550756

Allen, M. P., & Lincoln, A. E. (2004). Critical discourse and the cultural consecration of American films. Social Forces, 82, 871-894.

Giannetti, L. D. (2014). Understanding movies (13^th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Huisman, R., Murphet, J., & Dunn, A. (2005). Narrative and media (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Interview with Sabiha Sumar (2005, April 8). Retrieved December 6, 2015, from http://asiasociety.org/interview-sabiha-sumar

Margolin, U. (1986). The doer and the deed: Action as a basis for characterization in narrative. Poetics Today, 7, 205-25. doi:10.2307/1772759

Rehman, M. (2016). Discourse on gender, religion, and culture in Pakistani films: A narrative analysis of contemporary independent films from Pakistan. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cj_etds/94

Riessman, C. K. (2005). Narrative analysis. In N. Kelly., C. Horrocks., K. Milnes., B. Roberts., & D. Robinson (Eds.), Narrative, memory and everyday life (pp. 1-7). Huddersfield, UK: University of Huddersfield.

Sarris, A. (2004). Notes on the auteur theory. In L. Braudy & M. Cohen (Eds.), Film theory and criticism, (pp. 561-564). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Shoaib Mansoor’s interview with The Hollywood Reporter. (2008, May 26). Retrieved March 9, 2016, from http://pakimusicworld.blogspot.com/2008/05/shoiab-mansoors-interview-to-holywood.html

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

Staples, D. E. (1966). The auteur theory reexamined. Cinema Journal, 6, 1-7. doi:10.2307/1225411

Stokes, J. C. (2012). How to do media and cultural studies (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

Trier-Bieniek, A. M. (2015). Feminist theory and pop culture. Rotterdam, Netherlands: ePublishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-061-1